Epitaphs
For a Fool
On earth the wise man makes the rules,
And is the fool’s adviser
But here the wise are as the fools,
(And no man is the wiser).
For One Who Gaily Sowed His Oats
My days were but a thing for me to live,
For others to deplore;
I took of life all it could give:
Rind, inner fruit, and core.
For a Wanton
To men no more than so much cover
For them to doff or try,
I found in death a constant lover;
Here in his arms I lie.
For a Preacher
Vanity of vanities,
All is vanity; yea,
Even the rod He flayed you with
Crumbled and turned to clay.
In his poem “Epitaphs,” Countee Cullen writes gravestone inscriptions for four different unnamed people, showing how after death they all end up in the same place.
The first epitaph, written “For a Fool,” is used to show the life of a simple-minded man whose actions were governed by those who claimed to be more intelligent. The first two lines, “On earth the wise man makes the rules, and is the fool’s adviser,” describe the power dynamic between the two people during the fool’s life. Then, as the next two lines explain, “But here the wise are as the fools, (And no man is the wiser),” as both are laid to rest, no one can tell who was smarter. In this stanza, the ABAB rhyme scheme sets the lighthearted tone for the poem, despite the more serious subject matter. The iambic meter adds to this, creating a whimsical feel in contrast to the discussion of death.
The next is written “For One Who Gaily Sowed His Oats,” a phrase which describes a man who is seeking out as many sexual relationships with women as he can. This stanza continues the rhyme and meter seen in the first, suggesting a continuity between the two deceased. Cullen writes, “My days were but a thing for me to live, For others to deplore,” in reference to the idea that this man thought everything in the world was his to take, and was looked down upon by others for it. This is followed by “I took of life all it could give: Rind, inner fruit, and core.” This fruit metaphor describes the way this person ate up life to the point of gluttony.
The epitaph “For a Wanton” describes the counterpart to the prior man’s epitaph, a woman seeking the same sexual pleasure without commitment. Her gravestone reads, “To men no more than so much cover, For them to doff or try.” To her, men were temporary and expendable, and only to be used and sent away. However, after her life came to end, things changed, as it reads “I found in death a constant lover; Here in his arms I lie.” The afterlife is her first and last permanent relationship. Both this stanza and the prior are written in the first person, in contrast to the third-person perspective of the fool, suggesting the difference in the person who learned their lesson- in the fool’s case, the wise man, and in the case of the second and third, themselves.
The last epitaph, “For a Preacher,” takes a more unique voice in the second person, written as if it were the preacher speaking to his congregation. The phrase “Vanity of vanities, All is vanity, yea” comes from the Book of Ecclesiastes, as if the preacher were giving a sermon on this verse. In the last two lines, “Even the rod He flayed you with Crumbled and turned to clay,” the capital He refers to God, and the preacher is suggesting that even the ways in which God has punished you become insignificant with time and eventual death. Additionally, this epitaph takes on a different rhyme scheme, in the form of a ballad stanza. This shift shows a more affectionate attitude toward the preacher than the cemetery’s other inhabitants.
Cullen’s poem puts emphasis on the fact that death is the only guarantee in life. The main similarity between the four people is that in the end everything they valued became meaningless. Cullen’s epitaph demonstrates that all humans are the same once they are six feet under.


Hello Wyatt,
When I first read the poem, I was utterly confused about the whole thing. Why was there a graveyard in your cover photo and what is an epitaph? Who were these four people? Only after I started reading your essay, things started to fall in place. I definitely agree that this poem is surprisingly lighthearted for a topic like death which is probably why I was so confused at first. The funny thing is that my face had the same expression as the picture you put of Countee Cullen at the end of your essay. Overall though, I think the author is trying to expose the morbid reality of life and that everyone is going to end up dead eventually. Absolutely nothing in this world matters because time will make everything insignificant. Essentially he is encouraging the reader to take any path they wish is right for them because they only get to choose once. What are your thoughts on the broader purpose of this poem?
Hey Wyatt, Your poem was so interesting! Great job breaking down each of the four perspectives in the poem. Though there were many differences between each stanza, I liked how you focused on the use of first, second, and third person. For me, focusing on this technique allowed me to better understand the realizations of each individual and how they all piece together, fundamentally to support your idea that death is the only guarantee in life. But I must say, this is quite a depressing theme–basically the author is saying no matter what you do, you end up in the same place. I wonder if there are any other thematic ideas in this poem, what do you think? Or is the poem as straightforward as this single depressing idea?
Hey Wyatt!
I’d always wondered why people would come up with things to be written on their graves before they die, because to me the words on a tombstone are too few to summarize a life. I think your disassembly of this poem proved to me that, in fact, brief words more than suffice, for to the unbiased, one epitaph is the same as the next; crying that death truly is, and sadly is, inevitable.
I found it fascinating how you focused and deconstructed the rhyme scheme, which provided me considerably better views into the style of the individuals in question. Describing which perspective each stanza was in made me wonder just why Cullen may have chosen said perspectives. Perhaps the fool chose not to write an epitaph and instead took a general one? Or maybe he simply didn’t have anything to say? The two subsequent to the fool all seem to have some message from experience.
I wonder too if people use these epitaphs, and what I might put on mine.
Is it too unfashionable to link a website?
Hi Wyatt,
I think that the poem you chose is fascinating. I loved reading about each of the headstones and what they meant.
After reading your analysis, I come to a couple conclusions of my own. It was actually kind of depressing to read about each of the epitaphs, just because it showed the shortcomings of each person, rather than celebrating their achievements or enjoyments within life. Second, I thought it would be interesting to think of an epitaph to write. I’m not sure what I’d put on my grave, but I’d probably choose a play on words or a riddle that leads to a hidden treasure.