The Study of Ballet

A couple of years ago, I reentered ballet after nearly a year of recuperation from ankle injuries. With this studio, I was involved in all of the performances and classes necessary for my level, believing that a physically demanding ballet class almost every day would be a brief respite from intellectually demanding academics. Every step in class was grunting and bearing the physical labor, nothing more than hard work. Yes, I could memorize ballets and combinations, do them with some degree of proficiency, but my progress was slow. I had a good understanding of what to do, yet much less the how.

By January of this year, I had transferred to a new ballet school, with more intensive and higher quality training. It is not only the better training that has allowed me to really grow as a dancer, but also the development of an artist mentality- how specifically I will do steps and how I could better portray movement more cleanly. I have learned again and again under training of the artistic director that ballet is intensely cerebral, requiring real thought and careful consideration to connect with my audience.

For our spring performance, I was given the opportunity to showcase my learning and growth in various repertoire, including excerpts from the ballet Paquita. In the first few rehearsals I had with the artistic director, she said one word at most to me. And the quality of my performance remained the same- stagnant. There was one conversation I had with her on a Saturday afternoon after ballet class. She had wanted me to simply think through my entrance onto the stage. How I unfold my arms to the audience, and go through a centralized first position to shift into any port de bras (carriage of the arms). One must always work through a central position, be it first or fifth position of the feet, or first or second position of the arms- there is always a central place to where the arms return. Being consciously aware of this center and passing through it allows the dancer to be in constant control and balance, creating clean lines and transitions.

The mechanics of ballet are driven by the anatomy of the muscles surrounding the joints as well as the knowledge of how to activate them. In another ballet class more recently, the artistic director gave a lecture about passe (meaning “passed”) and what muscles to feel when reaching into an extension in derriere (to the back) attitude. Rather than allowing the knee to drop or thinking of reaching around and overcrossing the leg, one must lift the knee up in the passe and feel a very slight pelvic tilt allowing the hips to dip forward and create space for the leg to be higher in the back. This lesson can also be applied to pirouette turns as well- the feeling of lifting up versus spinning around like a top. Lifting up allows the dancer to keep their body on a singular axis of rotation.

Additionally, for even a single pirouette turn, the principles of physics apply. One guest teacher gave a lecture about the very subject, explaining the delicate balance of forces culminating in multiple successful rotations with one preparation. There is this whole coordination of the plie in fourth position, and movement of the arms to generate the momentum for the turn. What leads to the torque is the opposition of forces is the push off of the feet from the floor in opposite directions. That distance between the two feet on the floor, rotating away from each other generates those Newtonian equal and opposite forces which are then carried toward the supporting leg in the turn, on one point- one axis- of rotation. The larger the distance (up to a human amount) between the feet, the more torque would be generated versus from a closed fifth position.

Moving simultaneously, the arms that generate momentum should be held rigidly and at an appropriate distance from the dancer’s torso. The farther away the center of mass (influenced by the arms) is from the axis of rotation, the slower the dancer would turn. In contrast, the closer the arms are held to the body, the conservation of angular momentum applies and the dancer would rotate much faster. It is the comprehension and conscious acknowledgement of these principles that allows dancers like myself to more quickly and efficiently bring our body weight onto that axis of rotation and churn out successful pirouettes.

As a result of truly studying and analyzing the mechanics and movements of ballet, I am learning how to refine my dancing while improving my technical and artistic abilities.

The Fundamental Attribution Error

Observe the image. At the work meeting, the man in the purple tie is late due to a car accident, and the man in the red tie thinks that the purple tied man has poor punctuality. Yet, when they switch roles, the purple tied man makes the same judgement about the red tied man. Many have certainly misjudged others. Often, people’s perceptions of others’ behavior are clouded by an unempathetic and egocentric lens. And truly no one is an exception.

Still, it helps to learn about how people behave and function, considering the objective over the subjective.

This past school year, I have been taking AP Psychology, a course that has allowed me to understand the human mind and development, even applying what I learn to my life and observations of others around me. One particular concept that has resonated with me in our most recent unit, is the fundamental attribution error- the tendency for people to overestimate the influence of dispositional or personality traits and underestimate the influence of situational explanations when observing behaviors in others. Easily,  people- especially those from more individualistic countries like the United States- find fault in others’ personality versus assessing background factors. 

Case in point, I was recently shopping with my mom at a mall, and we met a highschool senior and her mother desperately trying to select a prom dress. My mom, who loves socializing, told the mother that her daughter looked absolutely wonderful in the last dress she fitted. The woman replied, saying that she was scrambling to find a nice dress, and that she appreciated the compliment for her daughter. Seconds later, her daughter came out of the dressing room, sulking, and brushed past us towards her mother, not so much as muttering a “hello.” The daughter gave her mother the dress, crossed her arms, and walked away. Later, when we were seated in the shoe section, my mom commented on how the daughter is rude and not as nice as her poor mother who is trying her best to please her. And thus, the fundamental attribution error is in play.

Realistically, the daughter could be exasperated from the fruitless search for prom dresses, and only acted that way as a means to cope with her feelings of rage and her exhaustion. She typically may not act that way, yet under the stressful circumstances, she acted within a human capacity and demonstrated her feelings in her actions. Regardless of who was in the right or wrong, this situation has indeed contributed to the behavior of both the mother and daughter.

To discover more about the nuances of the fundamental attribution error, I read a 2018 article written by Dr. Saul McLeod, explaining the background and history of this theory. McLeod writes that in 1967, researchers Jones and Harris hypothesized that people would “attribute apparently freely-chosen behaviors to disposition (personality), and apparently chance-directed behaviors to a situation” (2018). The researchers conducted an experiment in which participants listened to anti and pro Fidel Castro speeches, and were requested to rate the pro-Castro attitudes of speakers. It would be revealed to the participants whether those giving the speeches had selected their political position based on personal choice or on the whims of a flipped coin. It was revealed that even with the speakers whose positions were chosen by chance, participants rated the pro-Castro speakers as having a more positive attitude for Castro than those who were anti-Castro, thus suggesting that people cannot see others as simply completing tasks and were inclined to assign a sincere disposition to the speakers (McLeod, 2018). 

Even beyond the fundamental attribution error, we are commanded by our own biases. In the example I gave of my mom and I, it was rather interesting that she identified with the mother while I gave the daughter the benefit of the doubt, even with my analysis of the fundamental attribution error. It is probably best to keep in mind that no matter who one meets, regardless of how similar they may be to oneself, that they consider the objective situation before jumping to conclusions about those involved.

Works Cited

Mcleod, Saul. “Fundamental Attribution Error.” Fundamental Attribution Error Simply Psychology, 1 Jan. 1970, https://www.simplypsychology.org/fundamental-attribution.html.